Hello, well i wanna be sincere, i don't remember the curriculum of the college career, so for this blog i had to give a look to the curriculum.
The first year is very similar to others engineers, calculus and geometry, algebra , general chemistry, physical, there two courses that was more related with agronomy, and in second and third year (where i am now), the courses mostly are 100% with agronomy.
The workloads is tough but its depends of the course, and for complete the career and graduate is five years.
The faculty is from 1928 and some places looks very like olds places, the infraestructure is good in some places and anothers it denotes that is needs repairs or investment, some classroom are very good and with a lot of space, but there is more classrooms where there is no much space or need air - conditioning.
Like a my friend of my said, the faculty looks like if it had stopped in time, probably it haven´t had no changes in a lot of time, and denotes in the use of technology for example, in comparison of other universities, the use of technology reduces in only uses of computers.
The teaching methods depends on the teacher, but in general i think its good, but also i think we need a lot of practice in real life situations, and the option of looking for ourselves the solutions for the problems presents for this situations.
Hi. I share the idea that the faculty seems as if it has been left behind in time, and that the technology that exists there is not the best.
ResponderEliminarI hope things change :(
ResponderEliminar